This image was created with the tripod-mounted Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Autofocus lens and the Canon EOS-1D X digital SLR . ISO 400. Evaluative metering +1 stop off the low sky: 1/1250 sec. at f/7.1 in Manual mode. Central sensor/AI Servo Surround/Rear Focus AF active at the moment of exposure. Click here if you missed the Rear Focus Tutorial. Click on the image to see a larger version. The image created at 3:51pm was my very favorite. Your browser does not support iFrame. |
Catching Up/Working in reverse order
Is the Lethal Canon EOS-1D X Unfair to Flying Cranes?
With regards to “Is the Lethal Canon EOS-1D X Unfair to Flying Cranes?”: My favorites Sandhill Crane flight images, with my top pick first, were the dramatic 3:51, the small against the mountains 7:40, the landing pano-crop 4:01, and the moody 7:34am. Thanks to all who commented. As of 7:20pm eastern time on Tuesday I have responded to all of the comments.
This image was also created with the tripod-mounted Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Autofocus lens and the Canon EOS-1D X digital SLR . ISO 800: 1/2000 sec. at f/8 in Manual mode. 4:12pm. Image copyright 2012 and courtesy of Gaurav Mittal. Your browser does not support iFrame. |
Thanks Gaurav for sharing the very fine image above with us. I like it as much as any of mine. Gaurav is a serious student who travels regularly from India to join IPTs and study with me. He was quite skilled when he showed up for the Morro Bay IPT but he has worked hard, is very determined, and keeps on getting better and better. All that after a big name pro saw one of his images and told him to give up bird photograph! He took that and used it as motivation.
Image Transformation Questions
With regards to “Image Transformation Questions:”
1- I liked the sliver of tree that I left on left frame edge; I felt that it balanced the dark area of bushes on the right nicely.
2- In my humble opinion, the large dark area of mud on the lower right was ugly. That is why I eliminated it. Several folks referred to it as “dreck.” I agree.
From the Free Dictionary: dreck: Slang chiefly US for rubbish, trash. [From the Yiddish: drek = filth, dregs]
3-As far as the chevron pattern in the right corner, I am not sure if anyone would have commented had they not seen the original. Note, however, that there are some similar patterns on the right side of the image in the original….
4-A far as the “over-punched colors” I gotta say that in both the original and the optimized version that the colors look pretty accurate to me. It was a spectacular sunrise.
5-Yes to leveling the image and cleaning up birds that intersected with the frame edge.
6-Yes to a small crop and to a small increase in contrast (via NIK Tonal Contrast at about 33%).
7-As for the two birds top center that I removed, for me, they wrecked the compositional balance by being in the middle.
8: Good on Julian for realizing that I blackened the blacks–with a simple Levels adjustment.
9-You are all welcome and yes, good on me for getting you all to think.
Dressed to Kill
In “Dressed to Kill,” thanks to Doug Schurman for suggesting with regards to the who has more hair question that “Rick has more coverage but Artie has more volume.” I am of course bald up front like my late Dad was but there is a lot of hair in that big pony tail. I was 66 last June.
Same old same old; the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens, the Canon 2x EF Extender III (Teleconverter) (hand held at 245mm), and the Canon EOS 5D Mark III Digital Camera (Body Only) w/FREE Bonus Item – $145.83 Value! [expires soon]! ISO 50. Evaluative metering -2/3 stops as framed: 1/13 sec. at f/22 in Manual mode. Central sensor Surround/AI Servo/Rear Focus AF and re-compose. Click here if you missed the Rear Focus Tutorial. Click on the image to see the spectacular larger version. I achieved the slow shutter speed by having the Hoya 77mm Warming Circular Polarizer Glass Filter set to dark and screwed onto the front of my 70-200 II. See the original post for details on “set to dark.” With correct exposure for the WHITEs set manually I did not need to worry about changing the compensation when the birds flew in front of the dark distant mountain. Your browser does not support iFrame. |
Lucky Thirteen: Finally Blasting at 1/13 Sec.
In the “Lucky Thirteen: Finally Blasting at 1/13 Sec.” post, my favorite image was #4, above because of the swirling look of the flock.
Holiday Shopping Suggestions & Options
With many of the B&H items below the prices are so low that they cannot be advertised; you need to add the item to your shopping cart in order to see the super-low holiday sale price.
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lens
[Not a valid template] |
Canon Powershot S-100 Point and Shoot
[Not a valid template] |
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Autofocus lens
[Not a valid template] |
As regular readers know the Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Autofocus lenses for both Canon and Nikon mounts offer amazing focal length coverage and are razor sharp when used at f/8. Clemens van der Werf used the Canon mount model with fabulous results on the Cheesemans’ Ecology Safaris Southern Ocean expedition this past October and Robert O’Toole and Robert Amoruso have has been using the Nikon and Canon mount models (repectively) with great great success for years. Be sure to pick the proper mount lens for your system.
[Not a valid template] |
Suggested Stocking Stuffers
Shop Amazon
Tim Laman’s Amazing Birds of Paradise book
Lens Clens
[Not a valid template] |
Cracking head on images, Artie. Also love the swirling flock of geese. I find it sometimes difficult to create pleasing head on images, but you’ve done it here as always.
Hi Artie,
Just ordered the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lens and the 2X III tele-converter from B&H through this site. Great price on the lens through Dec. 20; B&H has free overnight shipping on both of them. Thanks for all of the info you share on the blog and newsletter.
Happy Holidays
Many thanks!!! And ditto on the holiday wishes. artie
What do you think are the comparative merrits of the 600 and 800mm lens?
I will do something definitive on this topic soon. Briefly: the 600 II is lighter, far more versatile, yields a long effective focal length at f/8, is likely a bit sharper, and actually cheaper than the 800….
Please remove me from the blogs and bulletins as I will be away from my computer for awhile. Thanks. Have enjoyed!
Vern, You need to manage your own subscriptions by clicking on the right hand link on the yellow tool bar at the top of this page :). artie